Twitter - @stevethorp1 Tumblr blog - psycho-bubble Poetry - editions poetry
February 2012 : My practice in Pembrokeshire is now open and a few appointments are available to start with on Thursdays. Spaces are limited at the moment so please contact me as soon as possible if you’d like to take one of these appointments. Information on my therapy and couple counselling and integral coaching can be found on the tabs above.
I am also available for organisational work and speaking engagements, so please contact me for details. I’m in the final phase of completing a new book – entitled Coming Back to Life – which will be published as an e-book and a soft-cover edition later in the 2012. In the meantime you can get a flavour of it at my psycho-bubble blog, and this month’s post on this site is an exclusive extract of one of the key chapters from the early part of the book. It follows on from last month’s post, so I hope you enjoy it.
Please do contact me if you’re interested in the book and my other projects this year, please get in touch me via the contacts page or email me at: info@lifescape.org.uk
An integration
extract from Coming Back to Life to be published 2012.
An integration of imperatives demands a new psychology – inherent with contradictions, but whole nonetheless. Determinism (‘this led to that’) of any kind just won’t do; moreover, pursuing activism or change without the psychological corollary is dangerous.
The trouble is that for a mind that likes order and certainty, there is always this point of view or the other. For this mind, depression must be the opposite of happiness, socialism is always in opposition to conservatism. For this mind, materialism and science oppose spirit, sanity counteracts madness, freedom stands against responsibility. We deny global warming or accept it, believe in a God or reject it.
This is a world of taking sides and stances; finding positions that must then be defended, regardless of evidence or the likelihood that sometimes contradictory positions can hold truth of a kind. So all psychological positions might be essential to a movement such as this. There can be little room for clinical simplicities and the pretence that we should be happy with the state that we are in; yet, there is always a place for helping people reduce felt pain and dysfunction, as long as this also involves understand, facing and knowing its source. And we might be taking a stand against happiness and sanity – at least in their shallower and most habitual forms!
The psychology of the soul imperative is one of depth, authenticity and calling. It has a phenomenology of watchfulness and subtlety, it is about the long-haul rather than the short-term. Politics and ecology, on the other hand, carry calls to action: a material activism of mind, body and earth. Here we might need honesty and hard thinking – even anger.

